The Theory of Star-Planet Coevolution

Chapter 1

恒星与行星共演论

Dr. Wei Ju

琚伟 医生 原创

All Rights Reserved!

Section-1

The coevolution-based true physical relationship between the Sun and planets

a) The wrong worldview-based misperception of the physical relation between the sun and the planets

I firmly believe that the basic premise for discovering a loophole-free astrophysical theory that can correctly explain the origin and evolution of the solar system is to first establish a series of correct worldviews or cosmic perspectives in our brains. One possible breakthrough that could profoundly revolutionize our worldview and change our scientific paradigm lies in radically changing our current misconception about the physical relationship between the sun and planets. I even assert that a correct understanding of the true physical relationship between the sun and planets will lead to the ultimate uncovering of the essential nature of gravity, which in turn leads to the ultimate discovery of a correct theory to explain the origin of the solar system. For this reason, I started my journey of exploring the mystery of the origin and evolution of the solar system with the exploration of the true physical relation between the sun and planets.

Due to the limitations of the non-essence-reveled and non-mechanism-explained kinematic descriptions provided by Newton's classical physics and Einstein's General relativity, the true physical relationship between the sun and the planets has long been misunderstood in such an extremely wrong way that the sun can only emit its matter-energy unidirectionally to the planets but cannot absorb any form of matter-energy from the planets. On the other hand, planets can only passively receive the matter-energy emitted by the sun, without giving any kind of planetary matter or energy back to the sun. In other words, since the initial formation of the solar system, all planets within the system have long been enjoying the "free energy lunch" provided by the “generous sun” without giving anything back to the sun (the purport of which will hereafter be called the “free solar energy-lunch paradox” or “non-exchanging paradox”, or “non-reciprocity paradox”). This is perhaps the most erroneous worldviews generated in the human brain, which has produced the biggest misleading effect on human exploration of the mystery of the origin of the solar system and seriously hindered the development process of human science. From the standpoint of the entire human history, this wrong cosmological perspective is inseparable from the early evolutionary history of humankind who survived the latest ice age. Like all other phototactic animals and planets on the earth, human beings have an innate desire for the photothermal energy from sun, which led to the origin of the sun-worship religion in primitive society. For this reason, the primitive sun-worship religion plays an important role in shaping and solidifying our wrong worldview, which in turn leads to our misperception of the sun-planet relation. This misleading effect is so profound that, even today, parents and teachers of all nations still like to use persuasive literary language to tell our children that the creatures on Earth and the Earth itself have always enjoyed the benefit of the “free energy”given by the “generous and selfless sun”. Even the most rational thinking scientists, like Newton and Einstein, are inevitably misled by this most erroneous worldview—which means that the most witty scientists are not likely to be any wiser than the ordinary people in misunderstanding about the physical relationship between the Sun and planets.

So, if the current dominant astrophysical theory expresses a completely wrong recognition on the physical relationship between the sun and the planets, then what is the correct relationship? My answer is that since the solar system is a holistic coevolutionary system, therefore, the true physical relationship between the sun and planet should be a coevolutionary relationship based on the several basic rules of mutually energizing with each other and mutually influencing on each other through a underlying mechanism of non-equivalent mass-energy exchange and asymmetric mass-energy hybridization. As an amateur astrophysist with a background of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM),all my new ideas about the revolutionized understanding of the physical relationship between the sun and planets are inspired by the Taoism-based natural philosophy, especially the four basic philosophical principles of Yin-Yang dialectics, which have been highly refined in the fundamental theory of traditional chinese medicine (TCM) since 1950s, which really helped me recognize the correct physical relationship between the sun and the planets and identify the fundamental physical mechanism of non-equivalent mass-energy exchange between the sun and planets and it also inspired me to further propose the four suggested laws of star-planet coevolution which become the core ideas of the theory of star-planet coevolution(the detailed explanations about the above-mentioned mechanism and four suggested laws and the related observational evidence in support of the new inter-solar-planetary physical relationship will be presented in following sections).

According to the basic principles of the yin-yang theory and the holistic views of the TCM, every system contains one or more pairs of energetically-coupling two subsystems, each of which has a yin-darkcold and negatively charged physical property, or a yang-photothermal and positively charged physical property respectively. And these yin-yang coupling subsystems must have a co-existing and coevolving relationship which manifest as the physical relationship of mutually energizing, mutually promoting with each other by means of performing the physical activities of bilateral and non-equivalent mass-energy exchange. According to the principle of property classification of yin-yang things, the sun is considered to be a celestial body dominated by yang-positive charge and photothermal energy, while a planetary body is considered to be a celestial body dominated by yin-negative charge and dark-cold energy. Based on this fundamental logic, the solar system must be a coevolution system in which the sun and the planets must co-evolve by means of mutually energizing and mutually promoting status, which is absolutely contradictory to the current non-coevolutionary ideas that are yielded by Newtonian and Einsteinian theories.  

As a doctor of traditional chinese medicine (TCM), my background of 8 years’ education in TCM has significantly strengthened my yin-yang paradigm and holistic way of philosophical thinking, which gives me a seminal philosophic inspiration that the solar system as a whole is surely a holistic coevolution system in which all the component bodies—the central sun and its orbiting planets must coevolve by means of performing the physical activity of mutually energizing, and non-equivalent mass-energy exchange and asymmetrical mass-energy hybridization—which becomes the first basic assumption that led to the subsequent discovery of the SSPR-dynamo mechanism—which is a plausible and verifiable physical mechanism of producing a low-flux but large-cross-sectional penetrating gravito-electromagnetic interaction between the sun and the earth.

It turns out that the correct physical relationship between the sun and planets is a mutually-influencing relationship underlined by a fundamental mechanism of mutually energizing, and bilaterally non-equivalent mass-energy exchanging and asymmetric mass-energy hybridization, rather than the unilateral relationship of the solar influencing on the planets and the unidirectional mass-energy transferring from the sun to planets implied by both Newtonian and Einsteinian theories—both theories do not predict any coupling between gravity and electromagnetic force, thus, they can yield any physical and philosophical implication that the sun and planets are in the dynamical status of constantly performing the activity of mass-energy exchange. Furthermore, if any evidence that confirms the fact that there is an existence of direct electromagnetic force bonding the sun and the planet and an direct electromagnetic-interaction-enabled bilaterally non-equivalent mass-energy exchange between them, then the Einstein’s interpretation of gravity as the result of the unilaterally solar mass-deformed  fabric of spacetime—which implies essentially an indirection force-linking between the sun and planets is fundamentally incorrect, thus the general relativity will go bankrupt and its century-long misleading effect on the progress of modern astrophysics would ultimately end. As one of my friend (who is a professor of astrophysics) predicted, it is very possible that the GT will be superceded by the new theory of star-planet coevolution as a newly-erected, more reliable pillar of modern astrophysics.

In this grand new, electromagnetic interaction-based inter-solar-planetary mass-energy exchanging picture, both the solar physical phenomena and the geophysical phenomena must be treated as the results of the sun-earth physical interaction based on the underlying mechanism of non-equivalent mass-energy exchange between the sun and the earth. Thus, a number of basic physical parameters of the sun and of the planets, such as their masses, densities, and magnetic fields strengths, etc, must dynamically change (either increasing or decreasing) in a synchronous manner (the purport of which will hereafter be called the general guiding principle of star-planet coevolution). Logically speaking, any form of a dynamic process of bilateral mass-energy exchange between bodies requires an existence of bidirectional-flowing particle streams. Among the notions described by the four fundamental interactions, only electromagnetic interaction meets this basic requirement. Considering the current progress in the experimental study of the unified field theory, it shows that there is increasing evidence pointing to a fact that all types of physical interactions are essentially the electromagnetic interaction which manifests in different ways. The above-mentioned seminal ideas that later led me to the discovery of the physical mechanism of how the gravito-electromagnetic interaction between the sun and planets can be created by means of the SSPR-dynamo mechanism—the Solar Stator and Planetary Rotor combined complex dynamo mechanism, and it also led me to the further discovery of the evidentially-supported (highly falsifiable) four fundamental laws of non-equivalent inter-stellar-planetary mass-energy exchange, also called the four suggested laws of star-planet coevolution. And the four suggested laws of nonequivalent inter-stellar-planetary mass-energy exchange become the core of the theory of star-planet coevolution. I can use the four suggested laws, together with other suggested principles and mechanisms to consistently explain not only the process of the origin and evolution of the solar system but also all the physical phenomena occurring in the solar system (for detailed explanations to afore-mentioned ideas, please read contents of chapter 2).

b) The plausibility and falsifiability of the SSPR-dynamo mechanism

As described above, the false cognition of the inter-solar-planetary relationship would inevitably lead to many “non-coevolutionary ideas” in modern astrophysics, which could further yield such a false physical implication that the Sun or the planets can evolve independently by themselves without performing any matter-energy exchanging activity. Today, even though a large number of research papers concerning the potential planetary tidal influence on the solar activity have been published, but still, the models and theories assume that the origin and modulation of the solar activity lie within the Sun itself, rather than the physical consequences of the solar-planetary interaction. In contrast, the theory of star-planet coevolution holds that the solar system is essentially a holistic coevlutionary system in which the Sun and the planets are coevolving by performing the physical activity of nonequivalent matter-energy exchange. In other words, the true relationship between the Sun and planets is essentially a physical relationship of mutually-energizing and bilaterally mass-energy exchanging. Logically speaking, the prerequisite for the operation of the underlying physical mechanism of the nonequivalent mass-energy exchange between the Sun and the planets is that there must be a large number of bidirectional-flowing particle streams which can be generated only by the universally ubiquitously operating dynamo mechanism. Based on this idea, I postulate that the gravitational interaction between the Sun and planets is essentially a special form of low-flux weakly-acting electromagnetic interaction which is mediated by a large number of invisible magnetized low-flux particle streams that are frequently intercutting and mutually entangling with each other on every step of their oppositely moving toward the nuclei of the Sun and the planets. I further propose that the gravito-electromagnetic interaction is caused by the Solar-Stator and Planetary-Rotor combined dynamo mechanism (SSPR-dynamo mechanism). In this physical scenario, the solar system as a whole can be understood as a giant complex dynamo system in which the Sun can be treated as a central stator surrounded while each planet can be treated as a rotator. Since the range of the Sun’s magnetic field can reach the edge of Oort cloud with a light-year wide spatial distance, it is physically possible that the rotation-orbiting synchronized motion of the system’s planets will enable each planet’s magnetic field lines to be frequently intercutting and entangling with the Sun’s magnetic field lines (both the observable high-flux part and the invisible low-flux part), the mechanism of which will generate a large number of asymmetrically bidirectional-flowing magnetized particle streams that are frequently intercutting and entangling with each other on every step of their oppositely streaming toward the cores of the Sun and the planet, creating a giant pipe-like Sun-planet-linking electromagnetic bond structure which mediates the gravito-electromagnetic interaction between the Sun and the planets. Thus, the newly suggested SSPR-dynamo mechanism should be the correct mechanism of causing the Newtonian gravitational interaction between the Sun and the planets. However, both Newtonian classical understanding of gravity (which is classified to be direct connection between the Sun and planets) and Einsteinian “advanced” understanding of gravity as mass-distorted space-time curvature (which is classified as non-directional connection between the Sun and the planet) do not yield any such physical implication that the gravito-electromagnetic interaction between the Sun and planets is merely an easy observing physical effect under which the essential nature of the Sun-planet’s gravito-electromagnetic interaction is the most fundamental mechanism of nonequivalent matter-energy exchange between them. Because both Newtonian classical theory of gravity and Einsteinian general theory of relativity are essentially dfferent types of kinematic descriptions about gravity, therefore, both theories cannot help us understand the SSPR-dynamo mechanism of generating the solar-planetary scaled low-flux but a large cross-sectional-penetrating electromagnetic interaction between the Sun and the planets. Not to say the physical implication of the nonequivalent mass-energy exchange between them.

Based on above-described new idea about the physical mechanism of causing gravity and the essential nature lies behind the apparent gravitational-pull effect, I shall have an enough reason to put forward an axiomatic principle to constrain the range of all possible alternative interpretations of the fundamental astrophysical phenomena occurring in the solar system—the principle of coevolutionality, which holds that all kinds of the natural phenomena occurring in the solar system, no matter where they occur, either they occurred in the Sun’s core (or photosphere) or on planet, they must first be treated as the results of the sun-planet’s gravito-electromagnetic interaction caused by the universal mechanism of the non-equivalent matter-energy exchange between the Sun and planet. And all kinds of physical mechanisms operating in the solar system, no matter where they operate, either they operate in the Sun’s core (or photosphere) or on planets, they must be treated as the physical mechanisms that are co-created and co-operated by both the Sun and Planets. According to the principle of coevolutionality, we can attribute the causes of all the astrophysical phenomena occurring in the solar system to the gravito-electromagnetic interaction between the Sun and planets based on the mechanism of nonequivalent matter-energy exchange. So, the principle of coevolutionality can help us effectively narrow the range of alternative interpretations of all fundamental physical phenomena occurring in the solar system.

c) The increasing evidence in support of the views of the planetary influence on solar activities may help mainstream scientists understand and accept my theory of star-planet coevolution

Because the principle of coevolutionality has not yet accepted by the mainstream community, therefore, the questions for a possible planetary tidal influence upon solar activity has been and still are the subjects of large debate, as early as 1872, Warren De La Rue, Balfour Stewart and Benjamin Loewy, had conducted their serious investigations on planetary influence upon solar activity [1]. But only until recently, the subjects of the planetary tidal influence on solar activity cycle and of the correlation between the direct solar activity indices and the planetary configuration gained more attention. For example, scientists began to recognize that the tidal forces of Venus, Earth and Jupiter can be superposed to create a stronger resultant tidal force that may significantly influence on the solar magnetic field and therefore dictates the solar activity cycle especially when there is maximum Venus-Earth-Jupiter alignment (S.D. Verma, 1986; A.J. Abreu et al 2012; Frank Stefani, et al. 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019) [1] [2] [3] [4]. In particular, Frank Stefani utilized the Taylor instability as a physical explanation for such an inter-solar-planetary correlation. However, ideas being proposed to explain the mechanism of the mutual physical influences of the sun and planets have not yet touched the essential nature of the physical relationship between the sun and the planets because of their ignorance to the existence of a macro-micro-unified fundamental physical mechanism of electromagnetic interaction-mediated non-equivalent matter-energy exchange between any two or more interacting bodies and such an electromagnetic interaction-caused non-equivalent matter-energy exchange between bodies has nothing to with the strength of interaction (an invisible electromagnetic bond), either for a giant inter solar-planetary celestial gravito-electromagnetic bond, or an inter-atomic bond—chemical bond, or the mass-energy scale of the interacting bodies or the space distance between the interacting bodies (force-acting range). The mechanism of the bilateral and non-equivalent inter-solar-planetary matter-energy exchange implies that the mechanism by which the sun produces its energy cannot be the mechanism of hydrogen-fueled nuclear fusion reaction, rather, the steady streams of multiplanetary-sourced electromagnetic energy-carrying matter jets colliding with the solar plasmatic materials both on the sun’s photosphere shell and the sun’s interior, creating a sun-planet co-created and co-operated physical mechanism of what I called the solar magnetic field-confined and the sun-planet’s double magnetic fields co-energized and the sun-planet’s double-sourced electromagnetic matter-jets colliding which constantly synthesizes various species of heavy metal elements in sun’s core. For detailed physical explanation and evidentially verification, please read the content of chapter 2.

Section 2

The essential nature of the coevolutionary relationship between the sun and planets

As a doctor of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and a Taoism believer, the Taoism-based TCM-way of philosophic thinking provides a lot of valuable philosophical inspirations that can be converted into a set of highly subversive new physical ideas. For example, the holistic way of philosophical thinking, which is stemmed from the ancient Taoist’s natural philosophy, inspired me to view the solar system as a whole as a coevolutionary system in which the Sun and its orbiting planets are coevolving by means of performing their physical activity of bilateral and non-equivalent matter-energy exchange. According to the Taoist’s general rule of viewing things, all physically coupled or bonded bodies in the universe can be generally classified as a Yin-negative body and a Yang-positive body by means of assigning them the basic physical properties, in the solar system, for example, the sun can be viewed as a Yang-positive body while all the system’s planets can be collectively viewed as a group of Yin-negative bodies. If a system is made of a Yang-positive body and a group of Yin-negative bodies, this system is a coevolutionary system in which the Yang-positive body (the sun) and the Yin-negative body (the planets) must co-evolve by means of performing their physical activity of bilateral and non-equivalent matter-energy exchange. This means that, for any of a coevolutionary system that contains a Yang-positive body and a Yin-negative body, the physical relationship between the Yang-positive body and the Yin-negative body must be a relationship of coevolution, which means that, within a coevolutionary system, none of the component bodies, either a Yang-positive body or a Yin-negative body, can evolve independently by themselves, but rather, they must co-evolve by means of mutually matter-energy exchanging and mutually energy supporting. The physical implication of such a Taoist’s basic philosophical principle is that, in our solar system, neither the sun (a Yang-positive body) nor the planets (a group of Yin-negative bodies) can evolve independently by themselves, but rather, the Yang-positive sun and the Yin-negative planets can only coevolve by means of bilaterally and non-equivalently matter-energy exchanging and mutually energy supporting. Because the co-performing physical behavior of the non-equivalent matter-energy exchange Yang-positive Sun and the Yin-negative planets is mediated by a large number of bidirectional-flowing and frequently intercutting and entangling electromagnetic particle streams characterized by a low-flux but a large cross-sectional-penetrating electromagnetic energy-carrying currents which are co-created by the SSPR-dynamo mechanism. Therefore, the inter-solar-planetary interaction is essentially a special form of macro-celestial electromagnetic interaction.

However, such a Yin-Yang rules of classifying the physically coupled bodies by just identifying their physical property only is not good enough to adequately describe the cyclic life-relaying process of how a parent or a progenitor celestial system evolving into a daughter celestial system. So, we need another Taoist’s philosophic inspiration to help us understand the biophysical relationship between the sun and planets by identifying the “gender” of celestial bodies according to the roles they played in their life-relaying process—the basic rules of functional identification of celestial gender. According to the Taoist’s basic principle of viewing things from the perspective of advanced life, all component bodies that are coevolving within a coevolutionary system, they can be biophysically identified as a male-father body and a female-mother body according to their functional roles they played in the cyclic life-relaying processes. These rules allow us to identify the “male-father body” and the “female-mother body” in a two-body or many-body system. Such a Taoist’s way of viewing things form the perspective of advanced life (one of the valuable Taoist naive cosmic perspective) inspired me to develop two rules of identifying the “celestial gender” (CG)—the two basic rules of functional identification of the celestial gender which is applicable in identifying male component body and a female component body in both a binary-star system and a single star system respectively (detailed explanation will be followed in chapter 2). Thus, the Taoist’s holistic way of viewing things, together with the Taoist’s Yin-Yang way of physical thinking, and the Taoist’s biophysical way of functionally identifying the “celestial gender” provide a set of comprehensive philosophical inspirations that inspired me to conclude that, in a planet-bearing single star system like our solar system, the central sun is a female-mother-natured celestial body because there have been many sun-core-gestated mass-growing embryonic metallic karyospheres that are growing in mass at an accelerate mass-growing rate just like a fast weight increasing fetus in a pregnant women in her later stage of pregnancy. and the mass that the sun gained is approximately equal to the amount mass-energy that the system’s planets collectively lost. In contrast, all the solar system’s planets can be grouped into a male-father body because the planet-ejected sunward-streaming electromagnetic energy-carrying matter jets, as a seminal matter particles, can be converted into the body masses of the sun-core-gestated mass-growing embryonic metallic karyospheres—the high-metal planetary embryos of next-generation planets by a suggested mechanism of even mass-coating (detailed mechanism explanation will be followed later). For a binary-star system, the rule of functional identification of celestial gender applies only in a merge-phased contact binary-star system, in this biophysical scenario, when a contact binary-star system evolves into its merge phase, if a component star that can eject out all its core-gestated massively matured embryonic metallic karyopsheres into the nearby circumstellar space and gives lives to a clutch of newborn baby planets, then this component star is called the female-mother star, whereas, if a component star that can eject out its core-gestated embryonic metallic karyospheres directly into the core of its female companion star, instead of ejecting its core-gestated metallic karyospheres into the nearby circumstellar space, then this component star is called male-father component star. The metallic karyospheres that the male-father component star ejected into the core of its female companion star will naturally form a seminal core of a daughter star—the next-generation star like the new-forming sun. Thus, the mechanism by which the planet is formed is stellar-merger-caused metallic karyosphere-ejection, whereas the mechanism by which the sun is formed is stellar-merger-caused seminal core-implanted plasmatic fusion. And the mechanism by the entire solar system is form is a special form of dynamo mechanism, which is above-described stellar-stator and planetr-rotor combined dynamo mechanism (SSPR-DM). For detailed explanation please read the content of chapter 2.

It turns out that the solar system is essentially a coevolutionary system in which the sun and the planets are coevolving by means of bilateral and non-equivalent matter-energy exchange and true physical relationship between the sun and the planets is of mutually matter-nourishment and mutually energy-supporting. In other words, without the constant matter-energy exchange between the sun and the planets, or the planet-sourced matter-energy transferring from the planets to the sun, the sun cannot even burn for a minute!

Based on the above-described principles and mechanisms involving the initial formation of the solar system, one can easily understand the premise in the understanding of the origin and evolution of the solar system is to understand the true physical relationship between the sun and planets as a relationship of bilateral and non-equivalent matter-energy exchange. And such a non-equivalent inter-solar-planetary matter-energy exchange may manifest as physical behavior of mutually matter transformation and mutual energy supporting between the sun and the planets.

Later, I found that the mechanism of non-equivalent matter-energy can also be used to explain the physical relationship of the any two or more chemically bonding atoms. Thus, I concluded that the mechanism of non-equivalent matter-energy exchange between any two or more electromagnetically interacting bodies, regardless of their mass-energy scales or of the space-time scales they occupy, either macro-celestial or micro-particle, is a central physical mechanism or core mechanism of the theory of star-planet coevolution and I use this core mechanism to explain the coevolutionary relationship between the sun and the planets, and, together with other fundamental laws and principles that I proposed in this theory, I can explain the origin and evolution of the solar system with a high degree of self-consistency and falsifiability. Thus, the theory of star-planet coevolution, by its name, implies its core ideas and it also implies a forthcoming paradigm shift in physics.

After all, as above-mentioned, I believe that a correct understanding of the true physical relationship between sun and planets is the first key step in the development of a correct theory of consistently explaining the origin and evolution of the solar system. Based on a consistent evidence chain that contains a set of direct and indirect evidence, I came up with a counterintuitive idea that the sun not only gives out its matter-energy to the planets, but also absorbs a large amount of mass-energy from the planet(s) simultaneously. More surprisingly, I found that, in a given interval of time, the sun can always absorb more amount of mass-energy from the planets than whatever it released to the planets, which means that the sun can always get a certain amount of exchange surplus value from the process of the solar-planetary matter-energy exchange. In other words, no planet in the solar system has ever received any “free energy” or “free matter” from the sun since the initial formation of the solar system, but rather, every single planet in the solar system must always return a greater amount of mass-energy to the sun than whatever it receives from the sun. This means that the sun is not a “generous” or “unselfish” energy donor as we previously thought, but rather, the sun is the biggest beneficiary in the deal of the solar-planetary matter-energy exchange (the purport of which will hereafter be called the second suggested law of star-planet coevolution). It sounds like that a golden rule that “there is no free lunch in the world” works so well in our human society also works well in the celestial society. Everything involving the physical relationship between the sun and the planets is a rule of nonequivalent matter-energy exchange. It turns out that the true relationship between the Sun and the planets is a relationship of reciprocally mass-energy exchanging and mutual-energy-charging (mutual energy supporting), rather than a unilateral relationship between an absolute energy-giver and a group of absolute energy-receivers (the purport of which will hereafter be called the principle of bilateral and non-equivalent stellar-planetary mass-energy exchange and mutual energy charging). This principle codifies a core idea that the determination of planetary energy to the solar activity cycle is equivalent to that of solar energy to the planetary activity cycle, the principle of which is called the star-planet’s mutual determinacy to their activity cycle.

Such a solar-planetary matter-energy exchanging and mutual energy supporting mechanism had long been established since the initial formation of the solar system. For example, in the earth-sun system, all the solar activities and all the geophysical activities, in both macro-celestial and micro-particle physical processes, are the results of the consequences of the fundamental mechanism of the bilateral and non-equivalent mass-energy exchange between sun and earth. The most of evidence we have collected in the support of the core ideas of the theory of star-planet co-evolution come from the modern observations of the earth-sun system. All the direct and indirect evidence point to a fact that our earth and some other terrestrial planets are collectively losing their body masses because of the non-equivalent solar-planetary mass-energy exchange. The relevant evidence will be presented in following section.

Section 3

The physical logic relationship between the macro-micro-unified electromagnetic interaction and the macro-micro-shared mechanism of non-equivalent matter-energy exchange

Logically speaking, any form of the mechanism of non-equivalent matter-exchange between interacting bodies requires an existence of bidirectional-flowing currents of matter-energy, and among the so-called

four fundamental interactions, the conceptually generalized electromagnetic interaction fits the physical picture because only the mechanism of generating an electromagnetic interaction can produce a large number of bidirectional-flowing currents of carrying electromagnetic energy. Inspired by this seminal idea, I immediately initiated my investigation on a possible celestial-scaled dynamo mechanism that is co-created and co-operated by both the sun and the planets—the idea that is logically consistent to the holistic view of the coevolution of the star and planets, and I found that the solar system as a whole can be visualized as a naturally multi-generator-combined giant dynamo device, in which the sun can be visualize as a giant central stator (star-acting stator) who’s magnetic field could extend to the edge of the distant Oort cloud, and all the system’s the planets can be visualized as a group of orbiting-spinning-synchronized moving rotors who’s magnetic field lines (including the high-flux visible portion and the low-flux invisible portion) are frequently intercutting and entangling with the far-reaching magnetic field lines of the sun, which generates a large number of bidirectional-flowing and frequently intercutting currents that are oppositely streaming toward the core of the sun and the planets which may manifest as a low-flux inter-solar-planetary electromagnetic interaction. Thus, we can naturally get a plausible picture of a solar system-scaled natural dynamo mechanism—a special form of the everyday familiar dynamo mechanism. I named this kind of special form of natural dynamo mechanism as a solar system-scaled Stellar-Stator and Planetary-Rotor Combined Dynamo Mechanism (SSPR-DM). The SSPR-dynamo mechanism can naturally create a cluster of invisible radial-configured and shifting weak-but-large-sized giant electromagnetic bond through which the bidirectional-flowing and frequently intercutting and mutually entangling electromagnetic currents would electromagnetically bond the cores of the sun (star-stator) and the planets (planetary rotors) together to form a holistic coevolutionary system in which the sun and the planets are coevolving by means of performing the physical activities of non-equivalent matter-energy exchange. Thus, the electromagnetic interaction between the sun and the planets are mediated by a large number of bidirectional-flowing electromagnetic particle streams that are frequently intercutting and mutually entangling with each other on every step of their oppositely streaming toward the core of the sun and the planets since the magnetic fields of the sun and the planets both arise from the their high-density and high-metal cores. This means that the real mediator of the inter-solar-planetary-scaled electromagnetic interaction is a large number of invisible bidirectional-flowing and frequently intercutting and entangling continuously-streaming electromagnetic currents that carry a large number of lepton-hardon-mixed particle streams, rather than discrete photonic particles. Such a sun-planet-linking electromagnetic bond acts as both an interaction-mediator and a matter-energy exchanging channel simultaneously. Thus, the principle that best describes the dualistic natures of the sun-planet-bonded gravito-electromagnetic bond is called the principle of channel-bond duality or tunnel-bond duality. The macro-celestial-scaled sun-planet’s electromagnetic bond resembles the micro-particle-scaled interatomic electromagnetic bond (chemical bond) and both are exactly the same thing because both share a common physical mechanism of bond formation and a common essential nature manifests as their dualistic functions, which is best described by the suggested principle of channel-bond duality or tunnel-bond duality. This idea led me to conclude that the so-called four fundamental interactions are essentially the different forms of electromagnetic interaction which is mediated by a large number of bidirectional-flowing and frequently intercutting and entangling electromagnetic currents produced by different forms of ubiquitously operating comic dynamo mechanism. It turns out that the macroscopic gravito-electromagnetic interaction between the sun and the planets and the microscopic interatomic electromagnetic interaction can be unified into a single interaction by finding their shared common mechanism and common essential nature, rather than discerning them by calculating the force strength and force range.

Besides the above-mentioned SSPR-dynamo mechanism, there is special form of dynamo mechanism that could operate in any two-body system, called mutually-statoring and mutually-rotoring dynamo mechanism (MSMR-DM), or the mechanism of orthogonal axial intersectional intercutting and entangling of the magnetic fields lines of two bonding spinning bodies. In this physical scenario, the axes of the electromagnetically coupled spinning bodies must be perpendicular to one another in order to maximize the field lines intercutting and entangling effect and optimize the electromagnetic bonding effect. The good example of the MSMR-dynamo mechanism is the earth-moon system, in this picture, the earth’s spin axis and the moon’s spin axis are always perpendicular to one another to keep an geometrically orthogonal axial intersectional intercutting status in order to maximize the field-lines’ intercutting and entangling effect and to optimize the balance of bidirectional-flowing electromagnetic energy streams which manifests as a stabilized electromagnetic bonding effect. The reason for why the earth-based observers can not directly see the backside of the moon is because the earth’s spin axis and the moon’s spin axis are perpendicular to one another due to the existence of MSMR-dynamo mechanism. The current-accepted explanation to this phenomenon is synchronous rotation which is completely wrong. Other examples of the MSMR-dynamo mechanism are shown ubiquitously in the universe as the various of binary systems, such as, in the various types of binary-star systems harbored in our Milky Way Galaxy, in which picture, the axes of any two electromagnetically-bonded component stars of a binary system are perpendicular to one another. And in the Milky Way-Andromeda binary system, the axis of the Milky Way and the axis of the Andromeda are perpendicular to one another. That is why the shape of the Andromeda galaxy is viewed as a spindle body.

However, both Newton’s classical understanding of the gravitational interaction and Einstein’s “advanced” understanding of the gravitational interaction provide no more than a non-nature-revealing kinematic description which does not yield any physical implication that any two electromagnetically-interacting bodies are actually performing their non-equivalent matter-energy exchanging activity.

In the new picture showed by the theory of star-planet coevolution, any form of the fundamental interactions is a special form of electromagnetic interaction generated by a special form of cosmic dynamo mechanism and the electromagnetic interaction itself is merely an easy observing physical effect, with the essential nature of any form of electromagnetic interaction being a fundamental mechanism of nonequivalent matter-energy exchange. This means that any two or more interacting bodies are subject to mass-evolution or mass-change, either gaining mass or losing mass. There is no such thing as mass-constant bodies because of the ubiquitously operating cosmic mechanism of nonequivalent matter-energy exchange between interacting bodies. So, in both Newtonian physical world and Einsteinian physical world, the masses of the force-interacting bodies are not subject to mass change (rest mass) and the reason why the masses of the interacting bodies keeps constant is because they don’t perform the activity of matter-energy exchange. Ultimately, the best way of testing the theory of star-planet coevolution is to test the suggested principle of tunnel-bond duality (or the principle of channel-bond duality).

Section 4

The evidence for proving the existence of the mechanism of non-equivalent matter-energy exchange between the sun and planets

To verify the existence of the suggested mechanism of bilateral and non-equivalent matter-energy exchange between the sun and the planets, we need to formulate a consistent evidence chain that contains the following two basic evidences:

(1) Evidence-1, the first evidence required to verify the existence of a potential mechanism of the bilateral and non-equivalent matter-energy exchange between the sun and planets is to verify the existence of bidirectional-flowing and frequently intercutting and entangling electromagnetic particle streams occurring in the inter-solar-planetary space that are characterized by low-flux but a cluster of large cross-sectional-penetrating bidirectional-penetrating currents. If a large number of bidirectional-flowing electromagnetic particle streams are found to be existed between the sun and planets, then the suggested mechanism of the bilateral matter-energy exchange between the sun and planets is naturally confirmed. However, the evidence of verifying the existence of bidirectional-flowing electromagnetic particle streams in the inter-solar-planetary space can only prove that the suggested mechanism of bilateral matter-energy exchange between the sun and planets does exist, but it does not prove that such an inter-solar-planetary matter-energy exchanging process follows non-equivalent rules, nor can it help us determine which party is the mass-gainer or the mass-loser. Therefore, we need two additional sets of evidence to help us identify the mass-gainer or mass-loser between the sun and planets.

(2) Evidence-2, the second group of evidence required to verify the existence of the suggested mechanism of non-equivalent matter-energy exchange between the sun and planets is to verify two basic facts: fact-1, the bidirectional-flowing electromagnetic energy-carrying particle streams are different in mass-energy density (flux density); fact-2, either the sun or the planet, is undergoing an irreversible process of continuous mass-increase (to become a mass-gainer) or mass-decrease (to become a mass-loser). For example, if we can identify such an evidence to show that, in any given time interval, the amount of mass-energy (or the mass-energy density) carried by the planet-sourced sunward-streaming particle streams is greater than that of the solar-sourced planetward-streaming particle streams. Plus, if we can identify an evidence to show that the planets and their satellites are undergoing an irreversible process of mass-decreasing or mass-decay. If so, then we can reach two such basic conclusions: conclusion-1, the mechanism of the bilateral and non-equivalent matter-energy exchange between the sun and planets is found to be true; Conclusion-2, in any given time interval, the amount of the mass-energy carried by the planet-ejected sunward-streaming particle streams is greater than that of the mass-energy carried by the sun-ejected planetward-streaming particle streams. Hence, the sun is undergoing an irreversible process of mass-increase which makes it the mass-gainer, whereas the system’s planets are collectively undergoing an irreversible process of mass-decrease which makes them the mass-loser.

The images of the planetary-solar jet-plasma colliding effects

Since the everyday familiar physical picture that all the solar system’s planets are constantly receiving the solar sourced matter-energy is a basically self-proving fact, therefore, any evidence that can prove the existence of a planet-ejected sunward-streaming matter-energy streams that can be absorbed by the sun can be treated as a conclusive evidence of naturally verifying the existence of a large cross-sectional-penetrating bidirectional-flowing particle streams that are streaming in two-way between the sun and planets. So far, the direct evidence that I have collected that is able to prove the existence of bidirectional-flowing particle streams in the inter-solar-planetary space are the images of showing several types of jet-plasma colliding effects which often occur in the sun-earth space, in many NASA-and CAST-published astronomic pictures and videos that reflect the dynamical physical scenario of the inter-solar-terrestrial space, I have identified several evidentially valuable images that clearly show that, during the solar maximum, there exist a flux of the lance-shaped earth-ejected sunward-streaming matter-energy jets with its jet-head colliding with the plasmatic materials of the sun’s photosphere shell, creating three types of jet-plasma colliding effects and I termed these three types of jet-plasma colliding effects as: the solar photosphere-splashing effect, the single-side solar photosphere-perforation effect, and the double-side solar photosphere piercing-through effect. The three types of jet-plasma colliding effect appear often in the period of solar maximum and are explained as follows:

The solar photosphere-splashing effect

The solar photosphere splashing effect refers to a physical scenario that occurs in the sun-earth space only in the period of solar maximum, due to a potential positive feedback mechanism that is operating in the inter-solar-planetary space, there appears to be a lance-shaped earth-ejected sunward-streaming high-density matter-energy jet violently colliding with the plasmatic materials of the sun’s photosphere shell on the sun’s earth-facing side, creating a bowl-shaped edge-symmetric depression much like a water splashing effect caused by a diving stone on water surface, the edge-symmetric feature indicates that the earth-ejected sunward-streaming matter jet is in a spirally moving status when its jet head approaching the surface of the sun’s photosphere shell. The photosphere-splashing effect carries the lowest energy level comparing with the single-side solar photosphere-perforation effect and the double-side photosphere piercing-through effect.

The single-side solar photosphere-perforation effect

As mentioned above, the single-side solar photosphere-perforation effect refers to a physical scenario that appears in the sun-earth space during the period of solar maximum, in this physical scenario, due to a potential positive feedback mechanism, the energy density of the sun-ejected earthward-streaming particle streams increases many times which causes a lance-shaped the earth-ejected sunward-streaming high-density matter-energy jet also increases in energy density. When an earth-ejected sunward-streaming matter-energy jet spirally approaching the sun, its jet head would violently collide with the plasma shell of the sun’s photosphere on the sun’s earth-facing side and perforate plasma holes on the photosphere shell which manifests as a single-side photosphere-perforation effect, in this physical scenario, the lance-shaped earth-ejected matter-energy jets would perforate a cluster of edge-symmetric holes on the surface of the sun’s photosphere shell at the sun’s earth-facing side which manifest as a group of sunspots. There may be two main reasons to explain for why the earth-ejected sunward-streaming matter-energy jets to carry such a high energy density, the firs reason is the positive feedback mechanism by which the sun-ejected earthward-streaming matter-energy jets increase in energy density which in turn causes the earth-ejected sunward-streaming matter-energy jets also increase in energy density in a positive feedback way. The mechanism by which the sunspot number will periodically increases to a maximum level is maximum multi-planetary jets superposition which forms a cluster of resultant jets with much higher energy density, which enable the density-amplified resultant planetary jet to perforate more number of photospheric holes with much wider diameters. Based on the idea, I put forward the idea that the mechanism by which the sunspot is formed is the planetary jet-perforated plasma holes on the surface of the sun’s photosphere shell. According to this hypothetical mechanism, I further proposed that, the value of the sunspot index, that is equal to the product of the sunspot number and the averaged size of the sunspots, reflects essentially the matter-energy scale of the (multi-) planet-ejected sunward-streaming matter-energy jets. Among the energy components of the multi-planetary resultant planetary jets, the mass-energy carried by the Jupiter-ejected jet is the dominant energy component because of its mass-energy scale and magnetic field strength, therefore, the 11-year sunspot cycle is determined by the 11-year orbital period of the Jupiter. In this physical scenario, for every 11.5 years, the orbits of the planet Venus, Earth and Jupiter will harmonically evolve into a maximum alignment of a straight line, called the maximum planetary orbital alignment of V-E-J (Venus-Earth-Jupiter or MA-o-VEJ)), in which physical scenario, the Venus-, Earth- and Jupiter-ejected jets will be fully superimposed to form a density-amplified resultant jet with its energy density being increased to a maximum high level, at this time, the number of jet-perforated plasmatic holes on the sun’s photosphere shell of the earth-facing side will reach the biggest counts. Essentially, the sunspot maximum is a period in which the total amount of the matter-energy exchanging value achieved by the co-work of the sun and the planets reaches the maximum level. Conversely, when the planetary orbital configuration evolves into a maximum alignment of Earth-Sun-Jupiter-Saturn (MA-o-ESJS), at the sun’s earth-facing side, the energy density of the earth-ejected jet alone is too weak to perforate an observable plasma hole on the sun’s photosphere shell of the earth-facing side, but at the sun’s back side, the Jupiter- and Saturn-ejected jets can be supposed to form a resultant jet which may create a large number of sunspots at the sun’s back side. Thus, when the planetary configuration evolves to be a maximum alignment of Earth-Sun-Jupiter-Saturn, the sun’s earth-facing side appears to be in a phase of sunspot minimum, but on the sun’s back side, there may be a large number sunspots created by the jet-supposition of Jupiter and Saturn. Hence, the two different types of planetary orbital configurations correspond to the sunspot maximum and the sunspot minimum respectively, that is, the maximum planetary orbital alignment of Venus-Earth-Jupiter (MA-o-VEJ) corresponds to the period of the sunspot maximum; whereas, the maximum planetary orbital alignment of Earth-Sun-Jupiter-Saturn (MA-o-ESJS) corresponds to the period of the sunspot minimum.

The double-sided photosphere piercing-through effect

The double-side photosphere piercing-through effect refers to the planetary jet-caused solar photosphere perforation phenomenon reaches the highest energy level due to the mechanism of multi-planetary jets superposition. In this physical scenario, the energy density of the multiplanetary superimposed matter-energy jet reaches such a high level that the sun’s entire photosphere shell can be totally pierced through from its earth-facing side to its backside. In this picture, there are multiple bright spots of solar flares often occur along the straight line connecting the cores of the sun and the earth, the electromagnetic jets ejected by the other planets that are superposed with the earth-ejected sunward-streaming jet are usually sourced from the Venus and Jupiter, and on a longer-term solar cycle the Saturn-ejected jet may join the process of multiplanetary jets superposition. For every 11-year sunspot cycle when the solar activity reaches the sunspot maximum, the planetary orbital configuration will evolve to be a maximum alignment of Venus-Earth-Jupiter, at this time, the Venus-ejected and the Earth-ejected and the Jupiter-ejected electromagnetic matter-energy jets will be harmoniously superimposed into a resultant jet with its energy density being increased to a such a high level that the entire photosphere shell of the sun could be totally perforated from its earth-facing side to its back side, which suggests an extremely high energy density achieved by the mechanism of multiplanetary jets superposition when the maximum alignment of Venus-Earth-Jupiter occurs. For detailed explanation for the causes of the sunspot and sunspot cycle formations, please see content of chapter 2, 3 and 4.

The above-mentioned three types of jet-plasma colliding effects can be interpreted as an evidence of verifying two facts: the first one is the existence of bidirectional-flowing particle streams occurring in the inter-solar-planetary space and the energy density and the second one is that the energy density of the planet-ejected sunward-streaming matter-energy jet could be high enough to pierce through the entire photosphere shell of the sun form its front side to its back side when the multi-planetary jet supposition occurs due to the maximum alignment of Venus-Earth-Jupiter (and Saturn). However, this does not mean that we can determine the mass-gainer and the mass-loser between the sun and the planets—the two major matter-energy exchanging partners unless we can find other evidence of indicating a mass-increasing or mass-decreasing process of the planets or of the sun.

The new interpretation of the lunar recession phenomenon and of the shrinking moon, shrinking Mercury and shrinking Mars as the suggested law of planetary mass-energy decay

Since we can not directly weigh the earth to evaluate that our earth is in a mass-decaying or mass-increasing process, therefore, we may have to look for some indirect evidence, among which, the lunar recession is a plausible evidence which suggest that both the earth and its big moon are undergoing an irreversible mass-decaying process, according to the Newton’s law of gravitation force, the gravitational force acting between the sun and planets is directionally proportional to the product of the masses of the two interacting bodies and is inverse proportional to the square of the distance between them. According to this equation, if the masses of both gravitationally interacting bodies are undergoing an irreversible process of mass-decay, the strength of the gravitational attraction between them will become progressively weaker and weaker, while the distance between them will become longer and longer. The lunar recession phenomenon can best interpreted as an existence of an irreversible process of the planetary mass-decay due to the mechanism of non-equivalent matter-energy exchange. And this conclusion can be reinforced by the crustal shrinking phenomenon which occurs in many planets such as the earth’s big moon, Mars, and Mercury are found to be in an irreversible process of body shrinking. [5] [6]

The new interpretation of the phenomenon of the synchronous decay of multiple physical parameters of the earth as an indirect evidence of indicating an existence of the suggested law of planetary mass-energy decay

Scientists have found that the field strength of the earth’s magnetic field has decreased by 10-15 percent so far which has been widely interpreted as a signal of a possible reversal of the planet’s lines of magnetic force.[7] However, I interpret the phenomenon of the fast weakening of the strength of the earth’s magnetic field as one of the evidence to show that the earth is undergoing an irreversible process of mass-energy decay due to mechanism of non-equivalent matter-energy exchange with the sun. Based on this idea, I proposed a law of planetary evolution, which is also called the suggested law of planetary mass decay. A more accurate description of this law can be called the suggested law of synchronous decay of the multiple planetary parameters. Here, the multiple physical parameters of an evolving planet include: the rest mass, mass-density (associated with metallicity), magnetic field strength, rotational speed, orbital linear speed and orbital radius. This means that, if an evolving planet is undergoing an irreversible process of (rest) mass decay, its energy must also decay. Thus, the process of planetary mass-energy decay must manifest as an irreversible process of synchronous decay of multiple physical parameters. Such as the decay of the rest mass of the current earth, the decrease of the earth’s mass density which is associated with the decrease in its metallicity which manifests as the lunar recession phenomenon; the weakening of the earth’s magnetic field strength which is observed as a basic fact; the slowing down of the earth’s rotational speed which manifests as the shortening of a timescale required for earth to complete a round of rotation; the shortening of the earth’s orbital radius (our earth is gradually approaching the sun) which manifests as the shortening of a timescale required for earth to complete a round of its orbiting motion about the sun. The core idea of the suggested law of synchronous decay of the multiple physical parameters of an evolving planet is compatible with the core idea of the Einstein’s principle of mass-energy equivalence. This means that, if the rest mass of an evolving planet is in an irreversible decaying process, then, its internal energy, which is expressed as several varying basic physical parameters such as the magnetic field strength and rotational speed etc, must also decrease.

It turns out that the current-evolving earth is undergoing an irreversible process of mass-energy decay which manifests as the decreases of the several measurable basic physical parameters because of the existence of the suggested mechanism of the bilateral and non-equivalent matter-energy exchange between the sun and planets. Once we understand that the true physical relationship between the sun and planets is of a non-equivalent matter-energy exchange which is manifested as an easy observing effect of electromagnetic interaction, then we can understand that the ultimate cause of the classical Newtonian gravity is essentially the SSPR-dynamo mechanism produced inter-solar-planetary low-strength but a large cross-sectional-penetrating electromagnetic interaction. In other words, electromagnetic interaction is the only one macro-micro-unified cosmic interaction produced by different forms of dynamo mechanisms and the inter-solar-planetary low-strength electromagnetic interaction is produced by the above-described SSPR-dynamo mechanism. However, the electromagnetic interaction itself is just an easy-observing physical effect, rather than essential nature of the force-propagation-manifested interaction. The essential nature of the macro-micro-unified electromagnetic interaction is ultimately a deep-hidden cosmic mechanism of non-equivalent matter-energy exchange between any two or more electromagnetically interacting bodies. Because of the existence of this cosmic mechanism, which enable a certain amount of mass-energy of one body or a component system to be transformed into another body or another component system through a large number of asymmetrically bidirectional-flowing and frequently intercutting and asymmetrically mass-energy-carrying electromagnetic particle streams.

One of the biggest defects of both the Newton’s classical understanding about the gravity and the “advanced” Einstein’s understanding about the gravity is their inability to understand the fundamental cause of the gravitational interaction between the sun and planets is essentially a special way electromagnetic interaction which is a low-strength but a large cross-sectional-penetrating electromagnetic interaction produced by SSPR-dynamo mechanism. There is such thing as an extra kind of fundamental interaction other than electromagnetic interaction. The second defect of Newtonian gravity theory and Einsteinian general relativity is that both theories only provided a kinematic description about the gravity-bonded moving bodies, and both theories do not provide such a physical implication that any two or more interacting bodies are performing the physical activity of non-equivalent matter-energy exchange. Thus, in both Newton’ s and Einstein’s physical worlds, the mass-energy scales of any two or more gravitationally interacting bodies, such as the sun and the solar system’s planets, do not experience a mass-decaying or mass-gaining process. In other words, both Newtonian and Einsteinian gravity theories gave us such a paradoxical physical picture in which any two more interacting and moving bodies can keep their body masses absolutely conserved forever without any change. Essentially, the core ideas of both Newton’s classical gravity theory and the “advanced” Einstein’s general relativity reflected a wrong worldview or a wrong cosmic perspective. This determined that the core ideas of both theories are fundamentally incorrect. And this is why the mainstream astrophysicists who are focusing on searching for the correct theory of the origin and evolution of the solar system are still on the wrong track due to the misleading and truth-shielding effects produced by the Newtonian classical understanding and Einsteinian “advanced” understanding of gravity force.

As described above, the physical implication of the existence of the suggested law of synchronous decay of multiple physical parameters of an evolving planet is that, in the far distant future, say, in about 10-30 billion years from now, the masses of all the solar system’s planets will be completely transformed into the body-masses of the sun-core-gestated mass-growing embryonic metallic karyospheres—the mass-growing planetary embryos of next-generation planets when the solar system as a whole would have evolved into a giant-core-gestated female-component star of the next-generation binary-star system, with its male-companion star would have evolved from the current Alpha Centauri system. For the detailed explanations for the mechanism of how the masses of the current-evolving planets in the solar system could be transformed into the sun’s core and converted into the body masses of the sun-core-gestated embryonic metallic karyospheres (the mass-growing planetary embryos of next-generation planets) and the mechanism of how our solar system is initially formed, please read the contents of chapter 2.

As mentioned earlier, any evidence that can prove the existence of direct electromagnetic force bonding the sun and the planets and/or any evidence that can confirm the existence of a mechanism of the direct bilateral mass-energy exchange between the sun and the planets, then the Einstein’s interpretation of the cause and the essential nature of gravity as the result of mass-deformed spacetime curvature will be proved fundamentally incorrect simply because the Einstein’s interpretation of the cause of gravity implies an indirect connection between the sun and planet while Newton’s interpretation of gravity implies a direct connection between the sun and planet. In this sense, Einstein’s general relativity is in fact not any better than Newton’s gravity theory. The reason why Newton attributed the gravitational attraction force to the density of matter is because that there is an intrinsic, innate positive mathematical relationships between the the four fundamental fundamental physical quantities, that is, the mean mass density of the two electromatically bonding bodies, the mean velocity of the rotating-orbiting-synchronized motions of the two bodies, the mean magnitude of the strength of two rotating magnetic fields, and the magnitude of the strength of the electromagnetical interaction force. In other words, the higher mean mass-density of the two bonding bodies, and the higher mean velocity of the rotating-orbiting-synchronized motions of two bodies, the higher mean magnitude of the magnetic field strength of the two bodies, thus the higher magnitude of the electromagnetic interaction force, and vice versa.

Since the mechanism by which electromagnetic force is mediated is a large number of bidirectional-flowing electromagnetic wave energy-carrying particle streams that are frequently intercutting and mutually entangling with each other on every step of their oppositely moving towards the mass-centers of the electromagnetically bonding bodies, therefore, the essential nature of the electromagnetic interaction is the underlined mechanism of non-equivalent mass-energy exchange and asymmetrical mass-energy hybridization between the interacting bodies. So, the limitations of both Newtonian and Einsteinian theories in discovering the real cause of gravity, and their failure to discover the SSPR-dynamo mechanism of producing the gravito-electromagnetical attraction force between the sun and planets is because of their failure to realize the innate physical coupling between gravitational and electromagnetic forces. And the failure to find the mechanism of how an electromagnetic force is mediated by a large number of invisible bidirectional-flowing electromagnetic wave energy-carrying particle streams that are always in a frequently intercutting and entangling status on every step of their oppositely moving toward the two mass-centers of the interacting bodies is the root cause of their inability to find the essential nature of electromagnetic interaction as being interpretated as process of a non-equivalent mass-energy exchange between any two electromagnetically interacting bodies. However, the Newton’s pioneering contribution to the discovery of the positive mathematical relationship between mass-density and the strength of the gravitational attraction force laid a first key solid base for the late-coming physicists to further discover the innate physical coupling between gravitational and electromagnetic forces. Once the SSPR-dynamo mechanism of producing the inter-solar-planetary electromagnetic interaction force is found, the innate positive mathematical relationship between the above-mentioned four fundamental physical quantities can be naturally discovered. Hence, the essential nature of electromagnetic force can be well described by the newly-proposed physical principle of tunnel-bond duality—which is the functional duality of an electromagnetic bond working between any two magnetic field-carrying bodies of all mass-energy scales.

References:

[1] Warren De La Rue, Balfour Stewart and Benjamin Loewy, “Further investigations on planetary influence upon solar activity” published: 01 January, 1872. https://http://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1871.0049

[2] S.D. Verma “Influence of Planetary Motion and Radial Alignment of Planets on Sun”, 1986. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-4732-0-13

[3] Abreu, AJ., Beer, Ferriz-Mass, McCracken, GK., Steinhilber .Tile: “Is there a planetary influence on solar activity?”

《Astronomy and Astrophysics》 2012,548 (Pt.2)

[4] F. Stefani; A. Giesecke; T. Weier, “A Taylor-Spruit model of a tidally synchronized solar dynamo”

DOI:10.1007/S11207-019-1447-1

[5] Bill. Staigerwald/Nancy Jones. “Shrinking Moon May Be Generating Moonquakes” . May 13, 2019. http://NASA.gov

[6] Bill Keeter, “The Incredible Shrinking Mercury is Active After All”. Sep 26, 2016. http://NASA.gov

[7] Kelly Dickerson. 《SPACE & PHYSICS》 “Earth’s Magnetic Field flip Could Happen Sooner Than Expected”, July 9, 2014

Dr. Wei Ju 琚伟 医生 原创

All Rights Reserved !

Revised 2022-5-02

编辑于 2023-03-29 12:09・IP 属地四川