9 October, 2017

 All right reserved !

Thispaper is the intellectual property of Dr. wei ju. You may not reproduce, edit,translate, distribute, publish or host this document in any way without thepermission of Dr. wei ju.

Note that there may be incorrectspellings, punctuation and/or grammar in this document. This is to allowcorrect pronunciation

Thechapter 4

The newly suggested five laws of planetary motion

I believe that the Kepler’s laws ofplanetary motion might have some imperfections, or the potential incorrectness,one of the flaws in Kepler’s second law of planetary motion is that the law presumedthat the orbital radii of all planets in Solar System remain no change, inother words, Kepler’s law expressed a viewpoint that all planets orbit about theSun permanently in the same orbit without any orbital evolution, nothingchanges in length of their orbital radii. However, modern study show that thetime-span of Earth’s orbital period displayed a long-term decreasing trend,according to the study of paleontological clock, scientists found that, in lateOrdovician of 440 million years ago, the Earth’s orbital period is 412 days; inthe mid-Silurian of 420 million years ago, there were 400 days per year; inmid-Devonian period, about 370 million years ago, there were 398 days per year;in late Carboniferous period, which was over 1 billion years ago, it was about385 days per year; In Cretaceous period, about 65 million years ago, it wasabout 376 days per year; Now it’s only 365.25 days per years. [citation needed]Beside the factor of slowing down of the linear speed of Earth’s orbital motion,the best explanation for this long-term trended decreasing of the Earth’sorbital period is that the Earth’s orbital radius is shrinking over time, itmeans that the Earth is getting closer and closer to the Sun. Considering the combinedfactors of the long-term slowing down of the linear speed of the Earth’sorbital motion and the factor of the long-term decreased orbital radius ofevolving Earth, we have reached a conclusion that Kepler’s second law ofplanetary motion is not hold to be true over a long period of time, because theKepler’s second law states that: a line segment joining a planet and the Sunsweeps out equal areas during the equal intervals of time, this statement canonly be approximately correct, but when put the law in a long period of time,say in billions of years, it will encounter is a serious problem due to the lawof planetary orbital decay, that is, if we use the first equal time interval “T1”to represent a given “said equal time interval” of the late Ordovician epoch (440million years ago), and use the second equal time interval “T2” to represent agiven “said equal time interval” of 21st century, say in some timein 2017, then get a mathematical result, that is: the orbital radius of currentEarth (R2) is way shorter than that of Ordovician’s Earth (R1), the mathematicalexpression is R2＜R1. Because of the significantly slowingdown of the linear speed of the Earth’s orbital motion, then in a equal timeinterval, the distance that thefast-moving Ordovician Earth had passed its orbital rings will far greaterthan the distance that the slow-moving current Earth had passed (as opposed tothe notion of closer to the Sun the planet moving faster), it means that thelength of the perimeter of the current Earth orbital ring that current Earthhad covered (L2) is way shorter than that of the Ordovician’s Earth (L1), thismeans that, the length of Kepler’s law described “a line segment joining the ancientEarth of Ordovician epoch and the ancient Sun is unequal to the length of aline segment joining the current Earth and current Sun, the mathematicaldisplay style is : L2＜L1, the result is S1＝(R1·L1）/2 ≠S2＝(R2·L2)/2，i.e., in Kepler’s language, a line segment Joining theOrdovician’s Earth and the ancient Sun sweeped a far greater area (S1),forcomparison, a line segment joining the current Earth and the current Sun sweepeda far smaller area (S2), the result is S1≠S2. Therefore,the Kepler’s second law of planetary motion is fundamentally incorrect. or  the Kepler’s second law of planetary motion canonly approximately describe the situation of planetary motion in a time-limitedshort period of evolution history of all planets, say, within time range of onehundred years, the Kepler’s second law of planetary motion is “ok”. when we thetime scale to billions of years, Kepler’s law of planetary motion is not work,or we may conclude that, Ultimately, the Kepler’s second law of planetary is nothold to be true. Because this does not reflect the real dynamically decayingstatus of planets’ orbital radii. In other words, the kepler’s second law of planet motion does not incorporate thesuggested law of planetary evolution at all. the Indeed, the word “motion”means something dynamically change, and the notion of planetary evolution shallautomatically including the orbital evolution. the nature of “natural law” isstable over a long period of time, and it’s universally applicable to anyplanetary objects within any scope of space-time. but the Kepler’s second law doesnot qualify  this criteria of naturallaw, simply because that Kepler trying to use a time-limited observation to fitthe non-time-limited law. It turns out to be a axiom, that any natural lawsummarized by man that is endeavor to mathematically describe a group ofco-changing physical quantities might proved fundamentally incorrect, if such alaw does not incorporate with the physical law that correctly described adynamically changing process of evolving objects.

the second flaw of the Kepler’s laws ofplanetary motion is that the three laws altogether implies a wrong viewpoint,that is, the orbits of all planets are in the same 2-D plane, this isimpossible, in fact, modern observations indicate that, over a long period oftime, the orbital rings of a given planet form a 3-D rubber-band-like sphericaldynamical structure, rather than a disc-like 2-D structure. And the orbitalrings of all planets in our Solar System jointly form a 3-D rubber-band-likespherical dynamical structure, rather than 2-D plane. the reason for scientiststo believe that the orbits of all planets are in the same plane is that, due tothe relatively slow linear speed of planetary revolution, in any given time, itis always possible for scientists to see spot some planet at the viewpointabove the north pole of the Earth, plus the preconceived notion derived fromthe incorrect Nebular Hypothesis, the highly misleading physical concept aboutthe planetary motion is deeply rooted in the 2-D-minded brains. The 3-Dovary-shaped heliosheath also implies a fact that the hypothetical orbitalrings of all planets in our Solar System form a 3-D rubber-band-like sphericaldynamical structure.  

To make the theory of star-planetco-evolution a high-level of self-consistence and to erase all possibleobservational contradictions, we have suggested five new laws of planetary motion to incorporatethe suggested law of planetary evolution, whichis the suggested law of theexponentially synchronous decay of seven fundamental planetary parameters:

(1)                          The first law of planetary motion states that: all planet orbit about theSun with their orbital radii in dynamically changing by following the rule oflong-term decay. the orbital decay will lead to the result of solar thermal-magnetic-spallation orripping to the sun-approaching core of life-ending planet, which becomesthe astrophysical mechanism of asteroid and comet formation. So, the firstsuggested law of planetary motion is also referred to as the law of long-term exponential planetary orbital decay.

(2)                          The second law of planetary motion states that: the orbits of all Solar System’s planets are not in the same 2-Dplane, but instead, over a long period of time, the multiple orbital rings ofany given planet form a 3-D rubber-band-like spherical dynamical structure. forthe planetary system as a whole, the orbital rings of all planets in SolarSystem jointly form a 3-D multilayer rubber-band-like spherical structure in a dynamicallychanging status with diameters of orbital rings in a long-term shrinking statusdue to the suggested law of synchronousdecay of seven fundamental planetary parameters. the second law is alsoreferred to as the law of 3-Drubber-band-like spherical-ring-crossed structure, as opposed to thetraditional notion which states that the orbits of all planets are in the same2-D plane.

(3)                          The third suggested law of planetary motionstates that: for any  given planet, the hypothetical axis of itsorbital ring stays in dynamically perpendicular to its rotational axis, inother words, for a given planet, the hypothetical axis of the its orbital ringand its rotational axis always stay in an dynamical orthogonal axialintersection status. this law is equivalent to the second law and leads to thesame result of the orbital ring-crossed rubber-band-like structure, but itrevealed the principle of dynamical change of the hypothetical axis of planet’sorbital rings and mechanistically explained why the sun-rise and sun-set appearto be following the motion direction of nearly 45 degree of angle, that is, thedirection of the Sun-rise is from the direction of North-East, rather than thedirection East. while the direction of the Sunset is from the direction ofnorth-west. Rather than the direction of West.   

(4)                          The forth law of planetary motion states that: the hypothetical axes of orbital rings of adjacent planets staysdynamically perpendicular to each other, or following the rule of orthogonalaxial intersection, in 180 degree straight line with the Sun at the mid-pointof the line, the orbital rings of two adjacent planets undergoes anin-out-switching phenomenon due to overlapped gravitational interactions betweenSun and planet, planet and planet, and gravitational interactions between theSolar System as whole and the super-massive black hole that lies in thegalactic center of Milky Way. This is law also referred to as the law of planetary orbital-switching and orthogonalaxial intersection. this could a potential mechanism to explain thelight-cross phenomenon of star widely seen in from a far distant star toEarth-based observer.

(5)                          The fifth law of planetary motion states that: in the case of Earth-moon system, or in any other single-moon-formed two-body system, the rotationalaxis of the planet stays dynamically perpendicular to the rotational axis ofits moon, in other words, the rotational axes of both the Earth and the moonstays in a dynamically orthogonal axialintersection status orthedynamically orthogonal axial geometrical relationship. This law is alsoreferred to as the principle ofdynamical orthogonal axial intersection, which is equivalent to the principle of the gravitationalinteraction force production, the mechanism of the gravity force production orthe principle of stable gravitational interaction relationship formation isthat, only when the spin axes of two objects forms a orthogonal axialintersection relationship, or the spin axes of two physically interactedobjects is perpendicular to each other, the entangling and intercutting effectof the magnetic force lines will be maximized and the biggest output of thegravitational pulling force will be produced, or the best gravitationalinteractional pull effect will be achieved. Because this principle ofgravitational force production is universal, therefore, we call it theuniversal law of gravitational force production, which is applicable to anypaired spinning systems with any mass-energy scales ranging from microscopicparticle systems to macroscopic celestial systems, that is why we in twocomponents coupled binary star system, the spin axes of two components aredynamically perpendicular to each other, the twisting effect of the dynamicallyorthogonal axial intersection will leads to the result of flipping over oftheir hypothetical baryon axis, creating a synchronized spin-flip motion style.In large scale space, we see the spin axis of the Milky Way Galaxy is alwaysdynamically perpendicular to the spin axis of the Andromeda Galaxy, and thehypothetical baryon axis of the Milky Way-Andromeda Binary Galaxy system isalways stay in a 360 degree flipping over status. forming a spherical shapedhalo. In the case of the microscopic particle system, the spin axes of pairedelectron and positron stays in a dynamically orthogonal axial intersectionstatus.

In general, the 3-D rubber-band-likespherical structure produced by the orbital rings of all system’s planets withthe orbital switching structure produces the stability of the Solar System andmake it possible for Solar System to produce the Great Radius Magnetic Vortex Systems which is the mechanism togravitationally suck the comets toward the Sun for secondary material recycling.And such a 3-D rubber-band-like spherical structure also make it possible forSolar System to form a 3-D ovary-shaped heliosheath and to form theSun-diameter-sized heliosheath-pore that evenly distributed on the surface ofthe heliosheath, that makes the entire Solar System an open system yet isolatedsystem to exchange its information and mass-energy with nearby stellar systemsand the surrounding environments. enable the Solar System to do the normal inhale-exhalerespiratory function like a life system.

Because the hypothetical axis of the Earth’sorbital ring and its rotational axis stays in a dynamically orthogonal axialintersection status, that is why the direction of the sunrise and sunset showsnearly 45 degree angles, this kind of planetary motion style produces a result,that is, each completed orbital ring of the Earth has its unique trajectorywhich is different from any other completed orbital rings, so unique like thefingerprint. For this reason, scientists can never find two trajectories of twocompleted orbital rings that can 100% match to each other from any viewpoints,not just because the flipping over of the hypothetical axis of orbital ring,but also because of the effect of planetary orbital switching, and the law ofplanetary orbital decay.

Dr.we ju

9 October, 2017

 All right reserved !

Thispaper is the intellectual property of Dr. wei ju. You may not reproduce, edit,translate, distribute, publish or host this document in any way without thepermission of Dr. wei ju.

Note that there may be incorrectspellings, punctuation and/or grammar in this document. This is to allowcorrect pronunciation